Evaluation of Data/Pilot Tracking Algorithms for GPS L2C Signals Using Software Receiver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current GPS constellation is being modernized to overcome the limitations of legacy GPS signals. L2C is the civilian signal added to L2 band as a part of modernization efforts. The major change in L2C signal structure is the inclusion of the pilot channel along with the data channel. In the context of tracking, the pilot channel carries the same information about frequency, phase and code errors. This information could be used along with that of the data channel for better tracking performance. This paper investigates the performance of Data/Pilot combined carrier-frequency tracking. A detailed analysis of existing methods to combine the frequency discriminators on data and pilot channel is done. Hybrid discriminators that make use of the data and pilot channel’s coherent integration output directly are proposed. Consequently, the performance of different possible combinations of the discriminators to form estimates of frequency error is analysed. They are evaluated under various ܥ/ levels. The advantages of using different discriminator combinations are demonstrated based on ܥ/ .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".