A Study of Parameters Relevant to Aeolian Vibration Calculations for Transmission Line Conductors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a study that was made to explore the compliance of the Alcoa Sag-Tension program, SAG10 with the T/m Theory as applied to overhead electrical conductors. The T/m theory states that the Catenary Constant, C (tension/unit length mass) is a constant between stranded conductors of an overhead line regardless of the conductor type when conductors are strung with equal aeolian vibration behavior. As a secondary interest, the Constant Aluminum Stress Theory — the theory that stress in the aluminum strands is the constant parameter between such conductors — was reviewed. It was found that neither the Catenary Constant parameter nor an aluminum stress value is found as constant between conductors by this program. The result is a lack of support for either of the T/m theory or the Aluminum Stress theory by the Alcoa program. Finally, the paper offers an example calculation that displays the absence of adherence to the T/m theory and the impact of the Alcoa SAG10 program on efficient conductor selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".