MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328059020 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-2468

Abstract 2468: Novel 4-(2-oxo-3-alkylimidazolidin-1-yl)benzenesulfonates highly selective against breast cancer cells: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation.

2013· article· en· W2328059020 on OpenAlexaff
René C.‐Gaudreault, Marie‐France Côté, Xavier Charest‐Morin, Jacques Lacroix, Sébastien Fortin

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresInnovation and Economic Development Trois RivièresUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerTamoxifenCancerMedicineCancer researchAromataseContext (archaeology)Internal medicinePharmacologyOncologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second cause of cancer death in women. In United-States, 229 060 new cases of breast cancers will be diagnosed in 2012 and they will be responsible for 39 510 deaths. Approximately 70% of the women breast cancer tumors are estrogen receptor positive (ER+). Unfortunately, around 35% of the patients will develop chemoresistance to antihormone therapy into aggressive hormone-independent tumors and about 10-20% of breast cancers are found to be triple-negative (ER-, PR- and HER-) and do not respond to hormonal therapy (e.g., tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors) and trastuzumab. In this context, new treatments improving survival and quality of life are intensively sought. To that end, we recently prepared new antimicrotubule agents designated as phenyl 4-(2-oxoimidazolidin-1-yl)-benzenesulfonates (PIB-SOs, exemplified by compound 1) exhibiting IC50 in the low nanomolar range and showing potent antitumoral and antiangiogenic potency in chick chorioallantoic membrane tumor assays (CAM assays). The structure-activity relationships studies of PIB-SOs lead to the addition of an alkyl group onto the free NH group of the 2-imidazolidone moiety which yielded phenyl 4-(2-oxo-3-alkylimidazolidin-1-yl)benzenesulfonates (PAIB-SOs, exemplified by compound 2-4) that are highly selective against breast cancer cell lines. A number of PAIB-SOs were prepared, characterized and evaluated for their antiproliferative activity on several cancer cell lines. The most potent compounds were assessed for their ability to inhibit cell cycle progression and to disrupt the cytoskeleton. The toxicity of PAIB-SOs was also assessed on chick embryos. Several PAIB-SOs exhibited antiproliferative activities in nanomolar range several on several breast cancer cells notably MCF-7, SK-BR-3 and the “triple negative” MDA-MB-468 cells whereas they exhibited antiproliferative activities in the micromolar range on non-sensitive cell lines notably MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma, HT-29 colon carcinoma and M21 skin melanoma cells showing a high selectivity ratios for the sensitive cells. PAIB-SOs arrested the cell cycle progression in G2/M phase and disrupted the cytoskeleton in sensitive lines. The selectivity mechanism of PAIB-SOs against breast cancer cells has not been identified yet but it is unrelated to hormone and HER2 receptors interactions suggesting that these compounds might be prototypes of a new class of drugs targeting human breast cancers. Citation Format: René C.-Gaudreault, Marie-France Côté, Xavier Charest-Morin, Jacques Lacroix, Sébastien Fortin. Novel 4-(2-oxo-3-alkylimidazolidin-1-yl)benzenesulfonates highly selective against breast cancer cells: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2468. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2468

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207