Selective Sensitization of Eu(III) and Tb(III) Emission with Triarylboron-Functionalized Dipicolinic Acids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three triarylboron- (Mes2BAr-) functionalized dipicolinic acids, namely, 4-(4-(dimesitylboranyl)-2,3,5,6-tetramethylphenyl)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (H2L1), 4-(4-(4-dimesitylboranyl)-2,3,5,6-tetramethylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (H2L2), and 4-(4-(4-dimesitylboranyl) phenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (H2L3), have been designed and synthesized. Lanthanide(III) complexes with the general formula of [NBu4]3[LnL3] (Ln = Eu or Tb; L = L1, L2, or L3) were obtained. The new triarylboron-functionalized ligands were found to be effective in the selective sensitization of the emissions of Eu(III) and Tb(III) ions with a high quantum efficiency (e.g., 0.54 for [NBu4]3[TbL13] in the solid state) upon excitation at ∼330 nm. An intraligand charge-transfer (ILCT) transition from the mesityl or aryl group to the boron or boron-aryl unit was found to play a key role in the activation of the Eu(III) and Tb(III) emissions, based on TD-DFT computational data and luminescence titration experiments performed using fluoride and cyanide ions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".