MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328153258 · doi:10.1364/qim.2012.qm1a.1

Experimental Tradeoffs in Quantum Measurement: Uncertainty Relations, Weak Measurement and Quantum Metrology

2012· article· en· W2328153258 on OpenAlexaff
Aephraim M. Steinberg, Dylan H. Mahler, Lee A. Rozema, Ardavan Darabi, Amir Feizpour, Xingxing Xing, Yasaman Soudagar, Alex Hayat

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in Optical Sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum metrologyMetrologyMeasurement uncertaintyQuantum measurementQuantum sensorWeak measurementQuantumQuantum imagingPhysicsQuantum opticsComputer scienceStatistical physicsQuantum technologyQuantum mechanicsOpen quantum system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I will present an overview of several recent and ongoing experiments investigating the limitations on quantum measurement. Was Heisenberg’s original limit wrong? When and how is entanglement useful for metrology?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.198
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1980.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.700
GPT teacher head0.529
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in Optical SciencesSame topicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationFrench-language works237,207