MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SIMULATION METHODOLOGY OF MULTIPLE WIND FARMS OPERATION CONSIDERING WIND SPEED CORRELATION

2010· article· en· W2328154688 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ning Zhang, Chongqing Kang, Xiaojun Tang, Jianjun Huang, Lu Zhan, Weizhou Wang, Jiaqing Qi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Power and Energy Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind speedEnvironmental scienceWind powerMeteorologyMarine engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringGeographyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a methodology to simulate the operation of multiple wind farms. The proposed model simulates the multiple wind farm output curves which fit the given statistical indices. Correlated wind speeds of different wind farms are generated by using stochastic differential equation which takes account of marginal distribution and time sequencing. Wind speed seasonal rhythms and diurnal patterns, turbine output characteristics, wind turbine reliability model and wake effect are considered in the model. The presented cases validate the effectiveness of the model and show that correlation among wind farms has significant influence on the stochastic behaviour of wind farm total output. The proposed model can be used to study the effects of large-scale wind power integration in power system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Power and Energy SystemsSame topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207