Adaptabilité des systèmes à logiciel prépondérant. Appropriation et démarche orientée aspect
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A technical system is designed to satisfy expressed users' needs, in a defined context of use, at a given time. The environment, in which this technical system is used, continuously evolves, given rise to new and unexpected needs. Users appropriate the technical system, modifying and adapting it to satisfy these new needs. This design activity, from the users, is not taken into account into engineering processes, methods and tools. The goal of this article is to suggest the definition of a continuous design process, taking into account this users' spontaneous design activity. This is based upon tacks-oriented design and uses aspect-oriented analysis, design and programming, to separate users' business activities issues and users' spontaneous design activities issues. It is necessary to insert metadata into the technical system, allowing aspects to inspect system's states modification and to update respectively system's models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it