MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2328241675 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100018679

Professor Barry N. Rewcastle (1931-2014)

2014· article· fr· W2328241675 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Harvey B. Sarnat

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of CambridgeChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research InstituteUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsAction (physics)Content (measure theory)PhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are saddened by the passing of Dr. Barry Rewcastle in January 2014.Immigrating to Canada from the U.K., he is now recognized as one of the major contributors to the development of modern Canadian neuropathology.After several years at the University of Toronto, he moved to the University of Calgary and became Head of the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine for two highly successful five year terms.I was on faculty during Dr. Rewcastle's tenure at the University of Calgary from 1981, and had the privilege of seeing him on several occasions even after his retirement in 2000.He was elected as the Representative of the Canadian Association of Neuropathologists (CANP) to the International Congress of Neuropathology in 1965 and later served as President of the CANP from 1976 to 1979.Barry attended the Worcester Grammar School on the River Severn, in western England, U.K. from 1943-49.He went on to the University of St. Andrews 1949-55, half-joking that all the best positions at Oxford and Cambridge were filled with soldiers returning from the war.He then immigrated to Canada, starting in Vancouver but later deciding to further his specialty training at the University of Toronto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.047

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→