MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328277857 · doi:10.1021/ct300205r

Natural Spinors Reveal How the Spin–Orbit Coupling Affects the Jahn–Teller Distortions in the Hexafluorotungstate(V) Anion

2012· article· en· W2328277857 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Zeng, Dmitri G. Fedorov, Michael W. Schmidt, Mariusz Kłobukowski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinorJahn–Teller effectIonDegenerate energy levelsAtomic orbitalSpin–orbit interactionSpin (aerodynamics)PhysicsPerturbation (astronomy)Theoretical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the Jahn-Teller distortions in the hexafluorotungstate(V) anion (WF6(-)) by applying the recently developed concept of natural spinors (spin-orbitals) and show that they are a very powerful tool providing simple and clear pictorial explanation for the spin-orbit effect in determining the structure of the anion. The calculations are performed at the levels of spin-orbit configuration interaction and multiconfigurational quasi-degenerate perturbation theory. The hexafluorotungstate(V) anion represents a very rare example of spin-orbit coupling enhancing the Jahn-Teller distortion, and the natural spinor analysis gives a clear interpretation of this enhancement. Advantages of using the natural spinors are explored and explained in detail in this case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Theory and ComputationSame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207