Effects of Surface Pretreatment of Glassy Carbon on the Electrochemical Behavior of V(IV)/V(V) Redox Reaction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper provides a systematic approach to investigate the reaction of V(IV)/V(V) redox couple and mainly focuses on the effect of surface roughness and functional groups derived from the pre-treatment on the electrochemical behavior of glassy carbon in V(IV)/V(V) solutions. 600-grit, 1200-grit and 4000-grit SiC sandpapers were utilized to change the roughness of the electrode surfaces. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) within different potential ranges were applied in advance to alter oxygen functional groups on the electrode surface as well as surface roughness. CV and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were then used to investigate the electrode behavior in 1 M V(IV)/V(V) (1:1) solution on glassy carbon electrodes. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to characterize the surface roughness. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was adopted to analyze the surface oxygen functional groups. It is shown that polishing and CV scans within different potential ranges can vary the electrochemical response of glassy carbon to V(IV)/V(V) couples significantly. Increased surface roughness is seen to be beneficial for the redox reaction while oxygen functional groups such as C=O and C-O-C tends to reduce the activity of glassy carbon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it