MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2328439672 · doi:10.2118/174240-ms

Chemical Sand Consolidation as a Failed Gravel Pack Sand-Control Remediation on Handil Field, Indonesia

2015· article· en· W2328439672 on OpenAlexaff
Antus Mahardhini, Izzad Abidiy, Hugues Poitrenaud, Shinta Wiendyahwati, Fanni Mayasari, Timothy Wood, Dicha Ariadi, Ceallach Magee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsNalco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsolidation (business)Environmental remediationPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceCompletion (oil and gas wells)Geotechnical engineeringGeologyEnvironmental engineeringMining engineeringContamination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Handil field is a mature oilfield located in East Kalimantan Indonesia, operated by TOTAL E&P Indonesie (TEPI). By 2012, there were several wells completed with Gravel Pack completions that were producing sand during production phase. This condition created a hydrocarbon production limitation around 3700 bopd from three oil wells. TEPI were looking at technical solutions to improve well performance. Within the solution options that exist, chemical treatments - that consolidate the near wellbore area - can be a viable alternative for a number of completion types. Chemical sand consolidation can give a formation additional residual strength. This can enhance a maximum sand free rate (MSFR). One chemical treatment developed is environmentally acceptable by North Sea standards and simple to deploy by in a ‘one pass’ pumping operation. Looking at the completion type and complication during sand control remediation pumping, this chemical was finally chosen. The simpler deployment operation, since there is no overflush, induces less risk during pumping the treatment. The active chemical reacts with connate water in the near well bore area and forms a polymerized network around and between the sand grains. This network imparts additional residual strength allowing the near well bore formation to withstand greater drawdown and fluid flow. This paper discusses the experiences of TEPI with respect to using the organo-silane based chemical treatment in Handil field, Indonesia. A well intervention campaign treats a number of production zones which were treated separately by sliding sleeve door (SSD) selection. To ensure liquid cleanliness prior injection into formation, the use of coiled tubing was required and the treatment programs were adjusted from standard designs to accommodate this. Most of the operation performed resulted in an increase of the MSFR (leading to production increase). One job result however was not as per expectation. The lessons learnt from these treatments and improvements in candidate selection will be discussed here. This first coiled tubing application of the organo-silane based chemistry and the need to manage multiple small batches of the water sensitive treatment in a humid and wet environment were challenges to overcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→