MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328442432 · doi:10.1504/ijpse.2015.075127

CHP within smart micro energy grid: optimum operation with distributed energy resources

2015· article· en· W2328442432 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Process Systems Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersOak Ridge National Laboratory
KeywordsDistributed generationSmart gridGridEngineeringInvestment (military)CogenerationEnvironmental economicsEnergy storageAutomotive engineeringPower (physics)Reliability engineeringRenewable energyElectrical engineeringElectricity generationEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A well-designed and maintained combined heat and power (CHP) plant can deliver significant economic and environmental benefits by reducing energy bills and CO2 emission. Recently, CHP is receiving increasing considerations for investment by national and international governments, as well as power grid companies to maximise the benefits from CHP. The variable demand of heat and power loads from the CHP plant and utility grid changing tariffs during the peak and off peak hours introduce more complexities to the control and the performance optimisation of CHP operation. In this paper, potential key performance indicators of CHP-based micro energy grid and the optimum utilisation of a specific grid with distributed energy sources are discussed. Optimisation algorithm is introduced to maximise the overall performance of CHP implementations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.922

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it