Retention and Excretion of 3H in Rats Following the Intratracheal Intubation of Tritiated Pump Oil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Saturated hydrocarbon mineral oils in vacuum pumps used in ³H handling facilities often contain significant amounts of ³H (as much as several hundred GBq L⁻¹), and during maintenance the air around an open pump may contain MBq L of volatile and aerosol species. It follows that H-contaminated pump oils pose a workplace hazard-especially if inhaled deposits are retained in the lung. A long-term study (1-y duration) was undertaken to establish the retention time of ³H-pump oil in the lungs of rats. Excretion data was collected to establish the mechanism of oil clearance from the lung. Finally, liver data was collected both to indicate the levels of H in the rat body and to indicate either the presence or absence of the transfer of unmetabolized pump oil within cells from the lungs to liver. Within 1 d following intubation into the trachea, ∼16.5% of the emulsified pump oil had been rapidly mechanically cleared to feces, and 1.1%, present as HTO, or exchangeable H, was excreted in urine. 69.4% of the instilled dose remained in the lungs as the initial alveolar burden. Subsequently, H cleared from the lungs with a retention half-time of of 223 d. The lung burden was mostly cleared to feces-indicating that the pump oil droplets remaining in the lungs were behaving like insoluble particles, but the kinetics of clearance of particles and oil droplets may be different. Overall, it is concluded that inhaled H-pump oil should most likely be regarded as an insoluble particulate (ICRP Inhalation Type S) for the purposes of radiological protection dosimetry, but the possibility of Type M behavior cannot be excluded.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".