MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Piratstvo - suvremena prijetnja sigurnosti plovidbe i događaj koji utječe na odgovornost pomorskog prijevoznika u prijevozu stvari

2011· article· en· W23284837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ivo Grabovac

Bibliographic record

VenueZbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLaw, logistics, and international trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NA ODGOVORNOST POMORSKOG PRIJEVOZNIKA U PRIJEVOZU STVARI UDK: 341.362.1 Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: ožujak 2011.Piratska djela u suvremenom svjetskom brodarstvu u znatnom su porastu i predstavljaju veliku opasnost za sigurnost pomorske plovidbe, za imovinu i ljudske živote.Veoma je aktualna raščlamba pravnog učinka piraterije (morskog razbojništva).U prvom dijelu rada autor obrađuje s međunarodnopravnog aspekta (pozivom poglavito na Konvenciju o pravu mora) kumulativne uvjete koji se moraju ispuniti za postojanje ovog međunarodnog zločina na moru.Osobito su relevantne mjere represije od strane država.Predlažu se i neke promjene i novine u sklopu klasičnog pojma piratstva, a u cilju učinkovitije borbe protiv ove suvremene pojave kriminala na moru.U drugom dijelu rada, sa stajališta pomorskog prava, autor obrađuje na temelju međunarodnih konvencija i domaćeg prava piratski čin kao događaj koji institutom izuzetih slučajeva utječe na odgovornost prijevoznika u prijevozu stvari.Ključne riječi: Piratstvo, međunarodni zločin na moru, kumulativni uvjeti, pravne posljedice, prijedlozi promjena, prijevoz stvari, piraterija kao izuzeti slučaj.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u SplituSame topicLaw, logistics, and international tradeFrench-language works237,207