Examining Dynamic Control-Display Gain Adjustments to Assist Mouse-Based Pointing for Youths with Cerebral Palsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Youths with cerebral palsy encounter difficulties in target acquisition using mouse-based "point-and-click" tasks. The performance of "point-and-click computer tasks" by youths with cerebral palsy still needs improvement to allow easy target acquisition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an algorithm intended to enhance the performance of point-andclick computer tasks for youths with cerebral palsy using a standard mouse. The curvature index-based algorithm for dynamic adjustment of control-display gain showed experimentally better performance during primary submovement, but worse performance during secondary correction sub-movements (higher number of sub-movements and longer movement time) for both typically developed youths and youths with cerebral palsy. It also showed better performance of average speed and maximum speed compared with Windows default settings. Furthermore, the average movement time, error rate, and overshoot rate for both typically developed youths and youths with cerebral palsy are higher using the curvature index-based algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".