MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328509018 · doi:10.1021/ie302184p

Effect of Ozone and Sulfur Dioxide on the Photolytic Degradation of Chlorobenzene in Air

2013· article· en· W2328509018 on OpenAlexafffund
Lianfeng Zhang, William A. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institute of Standards and Technology
KeywordsChlorobenzeneOzoneSulfur dioxideDegradation (telecommunications)ChemistryEnvironmental chemistrySulfurEnvironmental scienceInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The simplest chlorinated aromatic compound, chlorobenzene, was selected as a model organic pollutant to examine the photochemical destruction process in the gas phase, for potential application to flue gas treatment where oxygen, water, and sulfur dioxide may also be present. The degradation products under various reaction conditions were detected and found to include benzene, phenol, chlorophenol, chlorobiphenyls, HOCl, and HCl. The degradation pathways were elucidated based on the detected products and the literature. It was confirmed that dechlorination occurs before the aromatic ring is broken and that biphenyls can be formed. However, in the presence of added ozone, the formation of chlorobiphenyls was suppressed. The presence of sulfur dioxide resulted in attachment onto the aromatic ring, as confirmed by the S–C bond in the FTIR spectrum, and the formation of a benzenesulfonic acid intermediate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207