MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328557635 · doi:10.2514/6.2012-1568

Scaling Challenges Encountered with Out-of-Autoclave Prepregs

2012· article· en· W2328557635 on OpenAlexaff
Timotei Centea, S. M. Hughes, Steven Payette, James Kratz, Pascal Hubert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalingAutoclaveMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringForensic engineeringMetallurgyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The traditional manufacturing method for flight-critical aerospace structures made of composite materials is the autoclave. Autoclave processing is robust and well-understood, but involves high acquisition and operation costs. Out-of-autoclave materials and techniques are increasingly considered as cost-effective replacements to autoclaves; however, their capacity to accommodate scale-up issues commonly encountered when manufacturing larger parts have not yet been thoroughly investigated. The present study considers two such issues for a representative out-of-autoclave prepreg: the effects of resin out-time at room temperature and the material’s ability to evacuate entrapped air. Room-temperature outtime is shown to affect the resin flow phenomena that occur during processing and lead to dramatic increases in tow porosity; however, different temperature cure cycles are shown to mitigate this issue. The material’s permeability is shown to be adequate in-plane but practically non-existent through-thickness in the as-received condition; however, modifications are shown to increase this permeability to acceptable levels and consequently reduce porosity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEpoxy Resin Curing ProcessesFrench-language works237,207