MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328558051 · doi:10.1021/nn102248g

Microbubbles Loaded with Nanoparticles: A Route to Multiple Imaging Modalities

2010· article· en· W2328558051 on OpenAlexaff
Jai Il Park, Dinesh Jagadeesan, Ross Williams, Wendy Oakden, Siyon Chung, Greg J. Stanisz, Eugenia Kumacheva

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobubblesMaterials scienceNanoparticleNanotechnologyMedical imagingBiomedical engineeringUltrasoundMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a single-step approach to producing small and stable bubbles functionalized with nanoparticles. The strategy includes the following events occurring in sequence: (i) a microfluidic generation of bubbles from a mixture of CO(2) and a minute amount of gases with low solubility in water, in an aqueous solution of a protein, a polysaccharide, and anionic nanoparticles; (ii) rapid dissolution of CO(2) leading to the shrinkage of bubbles and an increase in acidity of the medium in the vicinity of the bubbles; and (iii) co-deposition of the biopolymers and nanoparticles at the bubble-liquid interface. The proposed approach yielded microbubbles with a narrow size distribution, long-term stability, and multiple functions originating from the attachment of metal oxide, metal, or semiconductor nanoparticles onto the bubble surface. We show the potential applications of these bubbles in ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations132
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS NanoSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207