Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article décrit et reconstruit l’introduction de l’élevage de rennes à Amadjuak, en Terre de Baffin, en 1921. L’opération a mobilisé plusieurs familles de Saamis, ainsi que des Inuits recrutés au dernier moment pour aider ces familles et prendre la relève au départ de ces dernières. Elle se solde cependant par un cuisant échec, les derniers rennes étant finalement mangés par les loups et par les chiens. À partir de sources écrites – en particulier le journal du poste de la Hudson’s Bay Company – et de sources orales, les auteurs évoquent les raisons de cette issue dramatique et s’arrêtent plus particulièrement sur la difficulté de transformer des chasseurs en éleveurs, la chasse et l’élevage relevant de schèmes contrastés. Ils soulignent finalement que, pour les Inuits, le caribou demeure aussi associé aux espritsijiraitet aux défunts, une connexion qui ne s’applique jamais aux rennes importés par les Qallunaats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".