MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328600381 · doi:10.2514/6.2006-170

On the Use of Reynolds Number as the Scaling Parameter for the Performance of Plasma Actuator in a Weakly Compressible Flow

2006· article· en· W2328600381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersAir Force Research Laboratory
KeywordsReynolds numberScalingCompressibilityActuatorMechanicsPlasma actuatorFlow (mathematics)Compressible flowMaterials sciencePlasmaPhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsTurbulenceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dimensional analysis of momentum integral equation of boundary-layer flow in the presence of body force was performed to determine the scaling law for plasma body force for an application in boundary layer flow control. The motivation was to relate experiments on a model in a low-speed flow to the prototype in a high-speed, weakly compressible, flow. The analysis showed that the presumption that the matching of Reynolds number will match the effect of the body force on the boundary layer velocity profile was not substantiated. The scaling suggested a requirement for a change in the body force per unit span for a change in the size of the prototype in order to produce similar effect on boundary layer velocity profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it