MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328600492 · doi:10.15274/inr-2014-10057

Low-Flow Direct Carotid-Cavernous Fistula Caused by Rupture of an Intracavernous Carotid Aneurysm

2014· article· en· W2328600492 on OpenAlexaff
I‐Chang Su, Juan Pablo Cruz, Timo Krings

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Neuroradiology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCarotid-cavernous fistulaAneurysmFistulaRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) secondary to a ruptured intracavernous carotid aneurysm (ICCA) are usually high-flow lesions. On very rare occasions, a ruptured ICCA may present as a low-flow CCF, which poses a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma whether the aneurysm and the observed fistula are causally related. Herein, we describe a rare case in which a ruptured ICCA resulted in a low-flow CCF. We demonstrated our approach to clarify this clinical scenario, and also propose a possible pathomechanism to explain the existence of low-flow direct CCF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventional NeuroradiologySame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207