MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328600992 · doi:10.1071/aseg2006ab007

Computation of gridded traveltimes using a circular wavefront assumption

2006· article· en· W2328600992 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavefrontCurvatureEikonal equationComputationQuartic functionGeodesyMathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisAlgorithmGeologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traveltime computations are an integral part of modelling and imaging seismic data by providing efficient kinematic information on the location of propagated energy. The traveltimes may be computed analytically using simplifying assumptions, or may be estimated on a complex geological structure using raytracing or gridded traveltimes.A basic requirement for the propagation of gridded traveltimes is the estimation of one point on a corner of a square, given the traveltimes on the other three corners. A number of solutions are available to solve for the unknown time and are based on either a plane-wave assumption, a finite difference solution to the Eikonal equation, or an assumption that the wavefront at the square is curved. A solution for a curved wavefront assumption requires estimating the center of curvature, and requires solving a quartic equation. An alternate method is presented to estimate the center of curvature for a curved wavefront that uses an iterative procedure and does not require solving the quartic equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it