MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328601142 · doi:10.11159/ijecs.2012.004

Nonlinear Sub-Optimal Control for Polynomial Systems – Design and Stability

2012· article· en· W2328601142 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Electrical and Computer Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKronecker productNonlinear systemMathematicsLinear matrix inequalityKronecker deltaPolynomialControl theory (sociology)Linear-quadratic regulatorOptimal controlLyapunov functionLinear systemApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceControl (management)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many real world systems are inherently nonlinear. Therefore, the linear quadratic regulator theory is rarely efficient for these systems. In this paper, we propose the design of an optimal feedback control for polynomial systems in the indeterminate state variables. To deal with the case of a nonlinear infinite-horizon-cost-functional, we investigate the control based on the Lyapunov functions (LF) and by using the Kronecker product (KP) algebra. Then, we analyze the stability of the feedback and its domain of attraction (DA) in form of convex problems based on the linear matrix inequality (LMI) formalism. The practical sub-optimal control is evaluated through simulation results and comparative schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it