MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chemical Pressure Effects on Pyrochlore Spin Ice

2012· article· en· W2328627596 on OpenAlexaff
Haidong Zhou, Jinguang Cheng, A. M. Hallas, C. R. Wiebe, Gang Li, Luis Balicas, Jianshi Zhou, John B. Goodenough, J. S. Gardner, Eun Sang Choi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPyrochloreAntiferromagnetismSpinsPhysicsSpin iceSpin (aerodynamics)CrystallographyCondensed matter physicsPhase (matter)ThermodynamicsChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comparison among the two sets of studied pyrochlore spin ices, ${\mathrm{Ho}}_{2}{\mathrm{Sn}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$, ${\mathrm{Ho}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ti}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$, and ${\mathrm{Ho}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ge}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ with ${\mathrm{Ho}}^{3+}$ spins and ${\mathrm{Dy}}_{2}{\mathrm{Sn}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$, ${\mathrm{Dy}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ti}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$, and ${\mathrm{Dy}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ge}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ with ${\mathrm{Dy}}^{3+}$ spins, shows that the application of chemical pressure through each set drives the system toward the antiferromagnetic phase boundary from the spin ice region, which agrees with the prediction of the ``dipolar spin ice'' model of den Hertog and Gingras. Among all the studied pyrochlore spin ices, ${\mathrm{Dy}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ge}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ has the smallest ratio of ${J}_{nn}/{D}_{nn}=\ensuremath{-}0.73$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207