The structure of crystals, glasses, and melts along the CaO-Al2O3 join: Results from Raman, Al L- and K-edge X-ray absorption, and 27Al NMR spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Calcium aluminate glasses are important materials where AlO - 4/2 is the only network former. Aluminum in crystals or glasses between CaO and Al 2 O 3 can have different environments as a function of the CaO/Al 2 O 3 ratio. Using X-ray absorption at the Al K- and L-edges, Raman and 27 Al NMR spectroscopies, we have determined the structural surroundings of Al in glasses, crystals, and melts in this binary system. Aluminum is in octahedral coordination at high-Al 2 O 3 content (>80 mol%) and essentially in fourfold coordination with 4 bridging O atoms (BOs) at Al 2 O 3 contents between 30 and 75 mol%. At around 25 mol% Al 2 O 3 , Al is in tetrahedral coordination with two BOs. The presence of higher-coordinated species at high-Al 2 O 3 contents and their absence at low Al 2 O 3 imply different viscous flow mechanisms for high- and low-concentration Al 2 O 3 networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".