MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328715969 · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e31822f9501

OVS Hits the Streets!

2011· article· en· W2328715969 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anthony J. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyndicatePublic healthNews mediaPolitical scienceMedia studiesMedicineSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every month Optometry and Vision Science (OVS) publishes interesting articles that report advances in our field. Among them are articles that have considerable interest for the general public. But it is relatively unusual for optometric research to be featured by the public news media. Beginning in June 2011, our publishers agreed to take one of our articles each month and have their LWW medical writers craft a message from a research article selected by your Editor-in-Chief. It is written for the general public to be included in their news releases to international media news wires. It is distributed via LWW's press office and put on Newswise's MedWire and distributed to more than 5,000 vetted journalists at more than 500 global media outlets (print, broadcast, online, and syndicate). It is an impressive media list around the world including Australia/New Zealand (ABC), United Kingdom (BBC), Canada, France, major U.S. News and TV outlets (NPR, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, NY Times, Reuters Health, Wall Street Journal, Discovery Health channel, FDA News, and Gannett Healthcare Group News Syndicate), and Health magazines (e.g., Harvard Health Letter), China, Spain (El Mundo), Germany, Japan, major journals that carry science news (e.g., Lancet, Nature, New England Journal of Medicine, and Science), popular magazines (e.g., Oprah Magazine, Parenting, Child Magazine, Pediatric News, and WebMed), Poland, and Sweden (SBC). In June, the OVS Feature article by our Glenn A. Fry Awardee, Nathan Efron, was released as “Eye examination may provide clues to diabetic nerve damage.” It leads with the paragraph “Could a simple eye scan detect early signs of diabetes-related nerve damage? Recent research toward developing such a test is the topic of a special article in Optometry and Vision Science, official journal of the American Academy of Optometry. The journal is published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a part of Wolters Kluwer Health.” In July, the OVS Press Release featured font size and smartphones based on the OVS July article by Mark Rosenfield and colleagues at SUNY. It has already been picked up by dozens of media outlets around the world and a Google search (Rosenfield smartphones) shows entries on the first 55 pages of the Google search results! The article was typically reported by the media as “Smartphones may be taxing your eyes” with the opening paragraph “People reading text messages or browsing the Internet on their smartphones tend to hold the devices closer than they would a book or newspaper, forcing their eyes to work harder than usual, new research shows.” In August, there was a news release emphasizing the importance of rub and rinse in the care of contact lenses, leading with the statement: “‘Rub and rinse,' in conjunction with soaking of the lens, is the most effective regimen to recommend with all the multipurpose lens care solutions used with any type of contact lenses, according to the new study, led by Hua Zhu, PhD, of the Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.” And this month (September), there is a press release based on our lead article by Earl Smith publishing his Prentice Lecture on optical strategies for preventing and treating myopia progress. Smith notes that the overall pattern of research results suggests that optical treatment strategies for myopia control that take into account the effects of peripheral vision are likely to be more successful than strategies that effectively manipulate only central vision. The following month (October), the focus will turn to severe vision loss as the medical news item from OVS. It will be based on the October Feature article by Ava Bittner and colleagues at Johns Hopkins University Wilmer Eye Institute who report on new computer-based strategies for allowing reliable recording of vision measures for those who are severely visually impaired. In November, the press release will move to research from Alex Black and colleagues in Australia who show that visual field loss is quite predictive of falls in older patients with glaucoma. Readers of OVS, and particularly practicing clinicians who may be asked about these eye and vision issues they hear about in the public media, can follow the news releases each month at the OVS web site. At that site, the link to the Press Release has been added to the published article and is open to the public under “In the News.” I encourage you to check this out on the OVS web site at (www.optvissci.com). Anthony J. Adams Editor-in-Chief Berkeley, California

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207