MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Beauharnois Bridge, Montreal, Canada

2014· article· en· W2328768896 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alejandro Acerete, Javier Ayala, Gabriel Menéndez Pidal, Luis Peset

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Engineering International · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeckBridge (graph theory)Span (engineering)Beam bridgePrecast concreteStructural engineeringPrefabricationGirderCofferdamEngineeringFormworkBox girderAbutmentCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bridge over the Beauharnois Canal (BHC) is the main structure of the Nouvelle Autoroute 30 project, with a total length of 2551 m. It crosses the BHC and the Saint Laurent Seaway (SLS).This paper describes the development of the design and construction process of the Beauharnois Bridge carried out by a leading construction company in Montreal. It describes the construction procedures carried out to achieve the works in a schedule severely limited by the technical clauses of the contract and winter conditions.This paper emphasizes the different prefabrication systems employed in the construction of the bridge and the incremental launching technique used to erect the steel box-girders of the east part over the BHC and the SLS.The bridge superstructure is divided into two parts: the east part, formed by a closed composite structure with a steel box-girder spanning over 82 m, and the west part, designed with a concrete deck composed of five concrete prefabricated beams spanning a typical length of 45 m.The east part, with a length of 1456 m, was designed with no expansion joints. This side of the deck includes the main span of 150 m and was entirely assembled at the east abutment and erected in place using the incremental launching technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1590.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructural Engineering InternationalSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207