MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328773821 · doi:10.2514/6.2015-2915

Development of Generalized Summation-by-Parts Operators for the Second Derivative with Variable Coefficients

2015· article· en· W2328773821 on OpenAlexaff
David C. Del Rey Fernández, David W. Zingg

Bibliographic record

Venue22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstant coefficientsPartial derivativeOperator (biology)Differential operatorVariable (mathematics)MathematicsApplied mathematicsDerivative (finance)Operator theoryMathematical analysisPartial differential equationVariable coefficientDissipative systemMaterial derivativeSummation by partsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The generalized summation-by-parts (GSBP) framework enables the derivation of novel and potentially efficient provably stable high-order finite-difference operators, applicable on general nodal distributions. This paper explores the application of GSBP operators to the solution of partial differential equations with firstand second-derivative terms. Here, we investigate compatible and order-matched GSBP operators for the approximation of the second derivative with a variable coefficient. These operators are one order more accurate than the application of the first-derivative operator twice and more dissipative of underresolved modes. Several example operators are described in detail. To characterize the various operators, the steady linear convection-diffusion equation with a variable coefficient is solved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics ConferenceSame topicNumerical methods for differential equationsFrench-language works237,207