MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328803095 · doi:10.1149/1.2981874

Ballmilling of Carbon Supports to Enhance the Performance of Fe-based Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction in PEM Fuel Cells

2008· article· en· W2328803095 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Eric Proietti, Jean‐Pol Dodelet

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGeneral Motors of Canada
KeywordsCarbon blackCarbon fibersPyrolysisCatalysisMicroporous materialOxygen reductionChemical engineeringMaterials scienceProton exchange membrane fuel cellCrystalliteInorganic chemistryOxygenChemistryMetallurgyElectrochemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of ballmilling three carbon black supports on the ORR activity of Fe-based electrocatalysts was investigated. Catalysts were prepared by acid-washing these ballmilled carbon supports, then impregnating them with iron(II) acetate and pyrolyzing in NH3 at 950{degree sign}C. It was found that ballmilling the carbon support improved the ORR activity for catalysts made with Black Pearls 2000 (Cabot), but decreased it for those made with N650 and left it relatively unchanged for those made with N234 (both low surface area commercial furnace carbon blacks from Sid Richardson Carbon Corporation). For catalysts made with ballmilled Black Pearls 2000, it was found that ORR activity increases as i) degree of disorder increases, ii) the change in micropore surface area due to pyrolysis increases, iii) nitrogen content increases and iv) crystallite size (La) approaches 24 Aå. No compelling trends were found for catalysts made with ballmilled N234 and N650.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207