MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328841831 · doi:10.1109/embc.2014.6944082

Online tracking of the lower body joint angles using IMUs for gait rehabilitation

2014· article· en· W2328841831 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWearable computerKinematicsAccelerometerKalman filterGaitComputer scienceGyroscopePhysical medicine and rehabilitationRehabilitationInertial measurement unitTracking (education)Gait analysisMotion captureArtificial intelligenceJoint (building)Computer visionMotion (physics)MedicinePhysical therapyEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important field in physiotherapy is the rehabilitation of gait. A continuous assessment and progress tracking of a patient's ability to walk is of clinical interest. Unfortunately the tools available to the therapists are very time-consuming and subjective. Non-intrusive, small, wearable, wireless sensors can be worn by the patients and provide inertial measurements to estimate the pose of the lower body during walking. For this purpose, we propose two different kinematic models of the human lower body. We use an Extended Kalman Filter to estimate the joint angles and show that a variety of sensors, such as accelerometers, gyroscopes, and motion capture markers, can be used and fused together to aid the joint angle estimate. The algorithm is validated on gait data collected from healthy participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207