MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328854561 · doi:10.1021/ja405100z

Synthesis of a Single G-Quartet Platform in Water

2013· article· en· W2328854561 on OpenAlexaff
Grant A. L. Bare, Bo Liu, John C. Sherman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For over 50 years the G-quartet has been a defining self-assembled structure in biology and non-covalent synthesis. It is shown here for the first time that the G-quartet is isolatable in water in the absence of stabilizing G-quartet stacking or cations through the construction of a phosphate-linked template-assembled synthetic G-quartet. Synthetic design has facilitated preservation of the guanine base, ribose sugar, and phosphate components with correct linkage chemistry relative to G-quadruplex DNA. Thus, a minimal synthetic model of G-quadruplex DNA, as in that associated with human gene promoter or telomere regions, is represented by this system. An application as a probe for interactions between G-quadruplex DNA and potential anticancer therapeutical binding ligands is demonstrated. Binding constants of 10(5)-10(7) M(-1) magnitude and 1:1 stoichiometries for TMPyP4, piper, and azatrux ligands were determined, whereas perturbations in BSU1051 and BRACO19 ligand signal were not observed. These data suggest a unique test for critical end-stacking interactions at the exclusion of intercalative or looping interactions for G-quadruplex binding ligands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207