Le test de closure: Mise à l'épreuve d'un texte auprès de collégiens français et étude de validité.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La presente etude porte sur la mise a l'epreuve, aupres de 561 collegiens francais âges de 11 a 17 ans, d'une version abregee d'un test de closure standard qui fut elabore en Belgique francophone. Les resultats montrent que cette version possede un niveau d'homogeneite interne eleve, tant au niveau de l'eleve que de la classe comme unites d'analyse statistique, soutiennent sa validite convergente et permettent d'etudier les determinants des performances en closure. Ils indiquent que ce test evalue essentiellement deux facteurs, dont les structures grammaticales et la maitrise du vocabulaire. Les resultats obtenus soutiennent le bien-fonde de l'utilisation de la closure rationnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.052 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it