9<sup>th</sup> Conference of the Central European Division e.V. of the International Isotope Society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Title Author(s) Tetramethylammonium Tri‐acetoxyborotritide, a Reagent for Hydroxy‐directed Ketone Reduction H. Andres Synthesis of Tritium‐labeled Nucleosides with Anti‐HIV and Anticancer Activity G.V. Sidorov, Yu.B. Zverkov, N.F. Myasoedov, A.R. Cimpoia, A.B. Susan Tritide Reduction of Nucleosides and Carbohydrates M. Saljoughian, H. Morimoto, P.G. Williams, C. Than A New Homogeneous Complex for H/D/T Exchange Labelling R. Salter, T. Moenius. P. Ackermann. M. Studer, A. Morgan, M. Chappelle Synthesis of [26‐2H3]Brassinosteroids O.V. Konstantinova, V.A. Khripach, V.N. Zhabinskii, A.P. Antonchick, B. Schneider The Specific Activity Determination and Confirmation of Identity of a Radiolabelled Peptide Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry A.T. Rees, A. Colebrook Different Carbon‐14 Labelling Syntheses of Vardenafil D. Seidel Carbon‐14 Labelling of β‐Amino Acids and β‐Peptides M.I. Rodriguez, Y. Metz, R. Voges A Rapid Synthesis of 2‐Chioro[2,6‐144C]isonicotinic Acid T.P. Kelly, T.R. Rodgers, C. Wright Reduction of 2,4,6‐Trinitro[ring‐14C]toluene (TNT) with Baker's Yeast (Saccharomyces Cervisiae) M. Kröger, G. Fels Application of Microbiotic Methods for the Synthesis of Radiolabelled Isotopomers ‐ A Review [1] M. Mahnke, T. Moenius Screening of Storage‐Stability of 14C Radiochemicals A. Fredenhagen Application of AMS for Human ADME F. Waldmeier, R.C. Garner Binding Studies for Affinity Screening to the Exsorptive Transporter P‐Glycoprotein: [3H]Talinolol as Radioligand P. Langguth, A. Koggel, C. Dressler, G. Peinhardt, H. Spahn‐Langguth Stable Isotopes in Medicine G.E. von Unruh GMP‐Trends for Clinical Trial Samples R. Schnettler, C.R. Oechslein Changes in Radiation Protection in Law in Germany H.‐J. Reinecke Information Systems for Radiation Protection J. Gay, H. Graffunder
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.183 | 0.108 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".