MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328928934 · doi:10.2975/26.2002.145.153

Thinking out of the box: An intersectoral model for vocational rehabilitation.

2002· article· en· W2328928934 on OpenAlexaff
Shalini Lal, Céline Mercier

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric Rehabilitation Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Education and Employment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyWork (physics)Presentation (obstetrics)Vocational educationRehabilitationVocational rehabilitationLogic modelSociologyPsychologyPoliticsPublic relationsPolitical scienceMedicinePedagogyEngineeringSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined an intersectoral work insertion program that involves the collaboration of six stakeholders from different sectors in the community, including health and vocation. An innovative program logic model has been developed that explains the theoretical rationale behind intersectoral collaboration and work insertion. The principles and ideology of local development have led to the development of this program and have several implications for the social integration of individuals with mental illness. The paper first discusses how such an approach is developed and implemented and follows with a presentation of a model of an intersectoral work insertion program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric Rehabilitation JournalSame topicDisability Education and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207