MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328930937 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2016.2543138

Bulk Sensing Using a Long-Range Surface-Plasmon Dual-Output Mach–Zehnder Interferometer

2016· article· en· W2328930937 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Fan, Pierre Berini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferometryCladding (metalworking)Mach–Zehnder interferometerAstronomical interferometerRefractive indexOpticsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsSurface plasmonSurface plasmon polaritonPlasmonBiosensorDynamic rangePhysicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical bulk (refractometric) sensing of sample solutions is demonstrated using dual-output Mach-Zehnder interferometers built from long-range surface-plasmon polariton waveguides operating at a free-space wavelength of 1375 nm. The device of interest was constructed by embedding Au stripes in Cytop claddings and etching a fluidic channel through the top cladding of one arm of the interferometer to expose the Au stripe. Bulk sensing was carried out by flowing sequentially a series of solutions of different refractive index through the microfluidic channel. The optical powers of the two outputs responded sinusoidally and were complimentary, as expected in theory. Three detection schemes aiming at improving the detection limit are analyzed showing that the device benefits from a 2× larger dynamic range, and has the ability to suppress common perturbations, relative to a single output. A detection limit of ~4 × 10-6RIU is demonstrated, which can be further improved by lengthening the sensing channel. The device is promising for application as a biosensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchFrench-language works237,207