MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328983722 · doi:10.7202/1035794ar

La guerre civile « transfrontalière » : note introductive et provisoire sur les fortunes contemporaines de la guerre civile

2016· article· fr· W2328983722 on OpenAlex
Paul Elvic Batchom

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitique et Sociétés · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Geopolitics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La littérature consacrée à la guerre a souvent clivé les types de guerres entre celles dites classiques et celles dites civiles. Cette dernière catégorie se fonde sur son théâtre qui est le territoire d’un État et l’opposition entre un gouvernement et un groupe rebelle. Quoique consacrée, cette dichotomie ne résiste plus à l’épreuve des types de menaces nouvelles qui voient le jour ; notamment en Afrique où des groupes rebelles, encouragés par les solidarités transfrontalières claniques, ethniques, culturelles et autres, en font une ressource dans la guerre contre plusieurs gouvernements à la fois. L’insurrection de Boko Haram à la frontière camerouno-nigériane rend raison de cette logique. Cette réflexion vise à remettre en question la pertinence de la catégorie guerre civile souvent fortement liée au territoire d’un État, et à inviter à une analyse des fortunes contemporaines de la guerre civile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it