La guerre civile « transfrontalière » : note introductive et provisoire sur les fortunes contemporaines de la guerre civile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La littérature consacrée à la guerre a souvent clivé les types de guerres entre celles dites classiques et celles dites civiles. Cette dernière catégorie se fonde sur son théâtre qui est le territoire d’un État et l’opposition entre un gouvernement et un groupe rebelle. Quoique consacrée, cette dichotomie ne résiste plus à l’épreuve des types de menaces nouvelles qui voient le jour ; notamment en Afrique où des groupes rebelles, encouragés par les solidarités transfrontalières claniques, ethniques, culturelles et autres, en font une ressource dans la guerre contre plusieurs gouvernements à la fois. L’insurrection de Boko Haram à la frontière camerouno-nigériane rend raison de cette logique. Cette réflexion vise à remettre en question la pertinence de la catégorie guerre civile souvent fortement liée au territoire d’un État, et à inviter à une analyse des fortunes contemporaines de la guerre civile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".