MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328987906 · doi:10.1021/ef201616f

Vapor–Liquid Equilibrium (VLE)-Based Modeling for the Prediction of Operating Regimes in a Heavy Gas Oil Hydrotreater

2011· article· en· W2328987906 on OpenAlexaff
Mugurel Catalin Munteanu, Jinwen Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrodesulfurizationOperating temperaturePilot plantTrickle-bed reactorPlug flowEnvironmental scienceNuclear engineeringProcess engineeringThermodynamicsPetroleum engineeringChemistryMaterials scienceCatalysisEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a pilot-plant trickle-bed hydrotreating reactor, ideal operating regimes (plug flow, full catalyst wetting, and absence of reactor wall effects) are desirable to generate reliable, reproducible, and representative data for kinetics studies and commercial scale-up. In this study, the operating regimes of a heavy gas oil pilot-plant hydrotreating reactor were investigated under operating conditions of commercial interest using real petroleum feedstocks. Vapor–liquid equilibrium experiments and calculations were performed to accurately predict the fluid flows and the physical/transport properties of the vapor and liquid phases. These properties were subsequently used to predict the operating regimes under various operating conditions and to generate a map of operating conditions within which the desired operating regimes can be maintained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesFrench-language works237,207