MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329028434 · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000001264

The Effect of Extracellular Calcium on Oxytocin-Induced Contractility in Naive and Oxytocin-Pretreated Human Myometrium In Vitro

2016· article· en· W2329028434 on OpenAlexaff
Chiraag Talati, N. Ramachandran, José C. A. Carvalho, John‏ Kingdom, Mrinalini Balki

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxytocinMyometriumMedicineContractilityUterine atonyInternal medicineEndocrinologyCalciumExtracellularUterine contractionUterusChemistrySurgeryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Prolonged exposure to oxytocin during augmentation of labor is a significant risk factor for uterine atony, resulting in the desensitization phenomenon, a decrease in the responsiveness of myometrium to further oxytocin. The importance of extracellular calcium is well established in spontaneous myometrial contractility; however, its significance is unknown in the context of desensitized myometrium. We aimed to investigate the effect of low, normal, and high extracellular calcium concentration on oxytocin-induced contractility in oxytocin-pretreated human myometrium in vitro. We hypothesized that extracellular normocalcemia would provide superior oxytocin-induced contractility in both naive and oxytocin-pretreated myometrium compared with hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia. METHODS: Myometrial tissue was obtained from women undergoing elective cesarean deliveries and was dissected into longitudinal strips. Each strip was mounted in a single organ bath with physiological salt solution (PSS) under homeostatic conditions and then pretreated for 2 hours with either oxytocin 10 M or PSS (control). The tissue was then washed with PSS, and calcium concentrations were altered to reflect low (1.25 mM), normal (2.5 mM), or high (3.75 mM) levels, thereby providing 6 study groups. After equilibration in the desired calcium concentration, a dose-response testing to oxytocin 10 M to 10 M was performed. Contractile parameters were measured and compared among groups after square root transformation. The primary outcome was motility index (frequency × amplitude), and secondary outcomes included frequency, amplitude, and area under the curve. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four experiments were conducted from samples obtained from 36 women. In the control group, the mean motility index (√g·contractions/10 min) was significantly lower in the hypocalcemic group than in the normocalcemic group (estimated difference, -0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.82 to -0.04; P = 0.03). In addition, the mean frequency of contractions (√contractions/10 min) was significantly lower in the hypocalcemic (estimated difference, -0.27; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.09; P = 0.002) and hypercalcemic groups (estimated difference, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.02; P = 0.03) compared with the normocalcemic group. In the oxytocin-pretreated group, there were no significant differences in the values of any of the contractility parameters of the hypocalcemic or hypercalcemic groups compared with the normocalcemic group (mean motility index [√g·contractions/10 min] estimated difference, 0.10; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.43; P = 0.74 and -0.39; 95% CI, -1.10 to 0.32; P = 0.39, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In oxytocin-naive myometrium, normocalcemia provides superior oxytocin-induced contractility compared with hypocalcemic and hypercalcemic conditions. We were unable to draw conclusions regarding oxytocin-pretreated myometrium because of the small sample size relative to the large variability of the data. These observations warrant further investigations in laboratory and clinical settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207