Postural Characteristics of Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to compare the postural characteristics of idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients with different types of spinal curvature and to compare a motion capture and a sequential digitization technique to estimate the postural characteristics of the IS patients. METHODS: A total of 57 IS patients underwent a radiological, clinical, and postural geometric evaluations in an upright standing position as part of their regular follow-up. The posteroanterior radiograph of the trunk was used to measure the amplitude of spinal curvature. The postural evaluation was performed using a motion capture and sequential digitization technique providing the necessary 3-dimensional positions of anatomical landmarks. These landmarks were used to calculate postural parameters defining the position and orientation of the pelvis, shoulders, and shoulder blades. These measurements included lateral shift and angular measures of rotation and tilt. RESULTS: Significant differences in the frontal and transverse planes were found between the right thoracic (RTh), left thoracolumbar, and RTh-left lumbar (RThLL) patients. These characteristics were most prominent in the transverse plane for RTh patients, in the frontal plane for left thoracolumbar patients, and in the frontal and transverse planes for the RThLL lumbar patients. A strong positive intraclass correlation was also found between the parameters estimated with the motion capture system and with the sequential digitization system. CONCLUSIONS: Unique postural characteristics that are related to the type of the spinal curvature are evident in adolescents who have IS. Further work is necessary to assess how these measures may be used to monitor the progression of the spinal deformity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Quantifying the postural alignment of IS patients using surface anthropometric landmarks provides an opportunity to characterize the unique postural attributes that accompany each type of spinal curvature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".