MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329112848 · doi:10.2749/222137813806548578

Brunette River Bridge: New Upgrade, New Constraints

2013· article· en· W2329112848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jamie McIntyre, Keith Holmes, Marc Gérin

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Span (engineering)Civil engineeringUpgradePipeline (software)DeckGirderCorrosionForensic engineeringPrestressed concreteEngineeringEnvironmental scienceStructural engineeringComputer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Brunette River Bridge, near Vancouver, Canada, is a four-span, 100 m-long, prestressed concrete girder bridge carrying a major highway and jet fuel pipeline. Originally built in 1963, the bridge was first widened and retrofitted in 1997. Recently, the bridge was upgraded for a second time. Endangered fish habitat constrained the latest widening: unique, post-tensioned cantilevers were constructed to avoid impacting the river below. The original seismic retrofit concept was retained, even though the criteria had changed. Highway traffic and the jet fuel pipeline constrained repairs of corrosion damage to the deck and girders. Corrosion damage often extended beyond the areas indicated in the pre-construction condition survey. Design sought to anticipate potentially unwelcome surprises during construction, and had to react quickly to address the surprises that were encountered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReportSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207