Orientation Distribution of Highly Oriented Type I Collagen Deposited on Flat Samples with Different Geometries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structural arrangement of type I collagen in vivo is critical for the normal functioning of tissues, such as bone, cornea, tendons, and blood vessels. At present, there are no established low-cost techniques for fabricating aligned collagen structures for applications in regenerative medicine. Here, we report on a straightforward approach to fabricate collagen films, with defined orientation distributions of collagen fibrillar aggregates within a matrix of oriented collagen molecules on flat sample surfaces. Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) technology was used to deposit thin films of oriented type I collagen onto flat substrates exhibiting various shapes. By varying the shapes of the substrates (e.g., rectangles, squares, circles, parallelograms, and various shaped triangles) as well as their sizes, a systematic study on collagen alignment patterns was conducted. It was found that the orientation and the orientation distribution of collagen along these various shaped substrates are directly depending on the geometry of the substrate and the dipping direction of that sample with respect to the collagen/water subphase. An important factor in tissue engineering is the stability, durability, and endurance of the constructed artificial tissue and thus its functioning in regenerative medicine applications. By testing these criteria, we found that the coated films and their alignments were stable for at least three months under different conditions and, moreover, that these films can withstand temperatures of up to 60 °C for a short time. Therefore, these constructs may have widespread applicability in the engineering of collagen-rich tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".