MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329121822 · doi:10.1149/1.3655691

Synthesis, Characterization and Electrochemical Studies of Active Materials for Sodium Ion Batteries

2011· article· en· W2329121822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrochemistryLithium (medication)SodiumIonRedoxEnergy storageMaterials scienceElectrochemical energy storageInorganic chemistryCharacterization (materials science)ElectrodeNanotechnologyChemistryMetallurgySupercapacitorOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sodium ion batteries represent an interesting alternative to lithium ion batteries for large scale energy storage, due to the inexpensive and massive sources of sodium. Moreover, the incertitude related to lithium resources and their suppliers could become a major problem in the coming years. In this study, synthesis and electrochemical analyses were performed to examine TiO2 (B) and Na2Ti6O13's potential as negative electrode materials in sodium ion batteries. These materials were selected due to their well-known small cation insertion redox reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it