MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fondaparinux, the first selective factor Xa inhibitor

2003· review· en· W2329127636 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander G.G. Turpie, Bengt I. Eriksson, Michael R. Lassen, Kenneth A. Bauer

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Hematology · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesHamilton General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFondaparinuxMedicineAntithromboticHeparinLow molecular weight heparinAnticoagulantAnesthesiaVenous thromboembolismInternal medicineThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fondaparinux (Arixtra, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Paris, France) is a pentasaccharide that selectively inhibits factor Xa; it is the first of a new class of synthetic antithrombotic agents. Fondaparinux has a linear pharmacokinetic profile allowing once-daily subcutaneous administration. Absence of metabolism, complete bioavailability, and lack of nonspecific binding in plasma contribute to the predictability of its effect. Fondaparinux has been approved for use in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism following orthopedic surgery. In this setting, it was found to reduce VTE risk by more than 50% in comparison with the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin, with an incidence of clinically important bleeding not significantly different from that of standard low molecular weight heparin regimens. Furthermore, 4 weeks of prophylaxis with fondaparinux after hip fracture surgery was shown to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism by 96% compared with 1-week prophylaxis. Finally, the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux in the treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndromes appears promising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in HematologySame topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207