MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329131076 · doi:10.3917/ror.102.0043

La responsabilité sociétale et l’éthique comme vecteurs de l’engagement organisationnel

2015· article· fr· W2329131076 on OpenAlex
Andrée‐Anne Deschênes, Josée Laflamme, Fabien Durif

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’organisation responsable · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité du Québec à RimouskiUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’engagement organisationnel est un concept clé dans le champ du management. De surcroît, la responsabilité sociétale de l’entreprise et l’éthique organisationnelle suscitent de plus en plus l’intérêt des chercheurs. Les mécanismes liant ces concepts sont encore peu explorés. Les objectifs de cet article sont 1) de décrire les recherches liant engagement organisationnel et responsabilité sociétale ou éthique de l’entreprise et, 2) d’en proposer un cadre opérationnel. À partir d’une méta-analyse descriptive, plus de 20 ans de recherche sur l’engagement organisationnel dans une perspective de responsabilité sociétale et d’éthique organisationnelle sont résumés. L’analyse approfondie de 26 références, à partir de 16 revues scientifiques distinctes, montre que la RSE et l’éthique organisationnelle ont un effet positif sur l’engagement organisationnel. Un cadre opérationnel est proposé pour fournir aux praticiens et aux chercheurs des appuis concrets pour élaborer une stratégie RSE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.337
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it