MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329145399 · doi:10.2118/175922-ms

Sorption-Dependent Permeability of Shales

2015· article· en· W2329145399 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Lopez, Roberto Aguilera

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersChina National Offshore Oil Corporation
KeywordsKerogenSorptionKnudsen diffusionDesorptionAdsorptionPermeability (electromagnetism)Oil shaleRADIUSOrganic matterMineralogyDiffusionChemistryChemical engineeringGeologyPorosityThermodynamicsSource rockMembraneOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Shale gas reservoirs are fine-grained, organic-rich rocks with a well-developed pore network structure within the organic matter (kerogen). Organic pores in shale reservoirs exhibit small radii in the range of 0.5 to 100 nanometers, which indicate that non-Darcy flow mechanisms are present in these rocks in addition to viscous flow. Gas adsorption/desorption and gas diffusion from solid kerogen are some other important flow mechanisms in shales. Therefore, consideration of these phenomena is crucial for quantification of permeability of shales. A numerical procedure to calculate permeability of shales that accounts for all the above factors is introduced in this work. During shale's depletion, organic pore radius can change or remain approximately constant depending on the rates of adsorption and desorption. Previous investigations suggest that organic pore radius increases as desorption takes place, which in turn also increases the space available for free gas and reduces the amount of adsorbed gas. This phenomenon thus increases shale permeability. This paper goes further and indicates that pore diameter can increase, decrease or remain approximately constant with time depending on the on-going desorption, adsorption and diffusion from solid kerogen. The effects on pore radius and permeability of all these mechanisms, viscous flow and Knudsen diffusion are addressed in this paper with the development of a ID radial simulation model. Two independent methods, which approximately corroborate each other, are presented for calculating changes in pore radius. Results show that considering pore radius changes due to sorption and diffusion have a significant impact on estimation of shale permeabilities. The effects on permeability vary under different reservoir conditions. The importance of solid kerogen as a gas source and its effect on gas flow is highlighted. The solid kerogen feeds organic pores affecting the rate of adsorption. Consequently the organic pore radius does not necessarily increase during production; it can decrease or even remain approximately constant. It is concluded that ignoring viscous flow, Knudsen diffusion and changes in pore radius lead to erroneous permeabilities. Gas diffusion from solid kerogen can be quite significant in shale reservoirs and should be taken into account. The main contribution of this paper is the development of a numerical method for calculating sorption- dependent permeability of shales. The calculations include Darcy and diffusive flows, and changes in organic pore radius due to adsorption/desorption and diffusion from solid kerogen. This is the first time all the aforementioned mechanisms are analyzed in a single study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207