Novel fabrication process of AlN ceramic matrix composites at low temperatures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A novel processing method to fabricate AlN-MgO-MgAl 2 O 4 composites has been developed, using non-sintered, porous, aluminum nitride (AlN) preforms infiltrated with a magnesium alloy in two directions, downward and upward, at relatively low temperatures (650°C, 800°C, 950°C). Microstructural, phase, and chemical analyses show that at 950°C and 135 min holding time, a continuous network of ceramic phases can be achieved successfully. Magnesium oxide and spinel phases (MgAl 2 O 4 ) are formed in-situ, when nitrogen gas is used. Due to the formation of a magnesium nitride layer on the surface of the non-sintered aluminum nitride, the infiltration mechanism proceeds effectively. No metallic phases are observed in the samples processed at 800°C and higher: these samples show high electrical resistivity ranging from 6.73×10 8 to 2.10×10 11 Ωcm. Thermal diffusivity, heat capacity and density have been measured using the nano-flash method, differential scanning calorimetry and Archimedes technique, respectively. The effects of residual porosity and holding time on the thermal conductivity have been studied. Maximum thermal conductivity and density at room temperature are 96 W/(mK) and 2.45 g/cm 3 , respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it