MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329400279 · doi:10.1061/40885(215)25

SCC for Underground Sprayed Concrete Application

2006· article· en· W2329400279 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Millette, Michel Lessard, François Vézina, Alain Tremblay, Jean-Claude Leduc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsSt. Lawrence CollegeAgnico Eagle (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShotcretePipingGeotechnical engineeringMining engineeringForensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceGeologyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2003, the challenge of delivering a wet-mix shotcrete to the underground workings of the Laronde mine, at 2,150m (7,050 ft) below surface was met through careful mix design. Sending the mix through the vertical piping system in the shaft, literally put the mix into a free-fall situation, attaining speeds of 315 km/hr over a distance of 2 km. The friction encountered during the fall, raised the temperature of the mix by 10 degrees Celsius, altering its properties. Segregation and shootability were also concerns. An SCC wet-mix shotcrete recipe was developed to overcome these extreme conditions. Between the completion of testing, and January 2006, Laronde Mine has shot more than 35,000 m3 (46,000 yds3) of the SCC wet-mix shotcrete and is currently expanding their shooting capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative concrete reinforcement materialsFrench-language works237,207