Faire émerger le savoir d’expériencede parents pauvres : forces et limitesd’une recherche participative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente l’expérience et le point de vue de parents vivant en contexte de pauvreté. À la lumière d’une recherche participative réalisée avec deux groupes de parents vivant avec des enfants en bas âge, nous présenterons le savoir expérientiel commun qui a pris forme au fil des rencontres et des thèmes abordés. Il sera question des souffrances rencontrées, mais aussi des colères face à leurs conditions d’existence. Ils nous parleront de leur rôle de parents, et leur point de vue fort critique sur des programmes sociaux qui sont censés les aider. Nous nous pencherons sur les retombées de ces démarches, ainsi que sur ses limites en termes d’action, de croisements des savoirs et de transformation des rapports sociaux, en soulignant ultimement les enjeux politiques qui s’en dégagent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".