MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329444906 · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1275523

Permanent Implications of Intrauterine Growth Restriction on Cholesterol Homeostasis

2011· review· en· W2329444906 on OpenAlexafffund
Gurjeev Sohi, Andrew Revesz, Daniel B. Hardy

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Reproductive Medicine · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSick Kids FoundationMolly Towell Perinatal Research Foundation
KeywordsIn uteroHomeostasisFetusPlacentaIntrauterine growth restrictionDiseasePregnancyGlucose homeostasisCholesterolMedicineBiologyMetabolic syndromeEndocrinologyBioinformaticsInternal medicineObesityInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Susceptibility to disease begins during fetal life, and adverse events in utero are a critical factor in determining quality of life and overall health. In fact, up to 50% of metabolic syndrome diseases can be attributed to an adverse in utero environment. However, the mechanisms linking impaired fetal development to augmented cholesterol, an important clinical risk factor characterizing the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease, remain elusive. This review discusses the latest research in the fetal programming of cholesterol homeostasis from both clinical studies and animal models. It also underscores the role of the placenta as an important mediator in cholesterol homeostasis during pregnancy and uncovers some of the molecular mechanisms underlying how the homeostatic mechanisms in liver may be impaired in fetal and postnatal life due to undernutrition and/or hypoxia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Reproductive MedicineSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207