MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329448006 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4303

Abstract 4303: Definitive identification and characterization of ovarian cancer-initiating cells

2010· article· en· W2329448006 on OpenAlexaff
Jocelyn M. Stewart, Patricia A. Shaw, Carl Virtanen, Craig Gedye, Laurie Ailles, Marcus Q. Bernardini, Benjamin G. Neel

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD117CD44Ovarian cancerSerous fluidMedicineCancer researchCancerPopulationFlow cytometryPathologyInternal medicineCellOncologyBiologyStem cellImmunologyCD34Cell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Serous ovarian cancer (SOC) typically presents with advanced disease. Current therapy significantly increases survival, yet nearly all patients recur within five years and die of their disease. The cancer-initiating cell (CIC) hypothesis holds that only a subset of cells have the potential to extensively self-renew and give rise to other tumor cells. As their properties may differ from bulk tumor cells, CIC may be spared by available therapies. Identification and characterization of CIC may lead to more effective therapeutic strategies. Previous reports suggested the presence of ovarian CIC, but these findings require validation in primary human samples. Primary SOC were dissociated and depleted of CD45+ cells. Cell surface (CD133/CD44/CD117/CDCP1/MUC-1/VEGFR2) and functional (ALDH1) markers were examined by flow cytometry (n=105). All markers demonstrated intra-/inter-tumor heterogeneity; however only CD133, VEGFR2 and ALDH marked minority populations in all samples. In contrast to a report that CD44+/CD117+ cells identify ovarian CIC, CD117 was present on only half of SOC samples examined (N=75) and only one quarter had a CD44+/CD117+ population. Limiting dilution analysis of primary SOC injected in the mammary fat pad of NOD/SCID mice (95% take at 106 cells) revealed the CIC frequency in primary tumors (n=13) and metastases (n=6 +5 matched) to be ∼1/40000 (n=13). The CIC frequency was significantly higher (∼1/9000) in primary and recurrent ascites (n=16, p=0.002). Xenografts could be passaged at least 3 times, providing evidence of self-renewal. The CIC frequency remained constant in nearly all xenografts from primary tumors, but increased substantially with passage of recurrences, suggesting greater genetic instability. CD133+ cells from primary tumors (n=2), matched metastases (n=2), ascites (n=6) and passage 1 xenografts (n=6) were enriched for CIC (1/300-1/4000), and all (or the vast majority) of CIC activity resided within the CD133+ fraction. Xenografts from CD133+ cells gave rise to CD133+ and CD133- cells and could be serially passaged at least 1-3x. VEGFR2+ and ALDH1+ cells also were enriched for CIC, to a lower extent than CD133. In contrast, after sorting for CD117/CD44 (n=3), tumors arose from all fractions but CD117+/CD44+ cells. Our data are consistent with a hierarchical model of SOC and indicate that CD133 is a marker for ovarian CIC. Current work is devoted to profiling the CD133+ population and identifying additional markers, using high throughput flow cytometry and a panel of 234 antigens and other methods. Note: This abstract was not presented at the AACR 101st Annual Meeting 2010 because the presenter was unable to attend. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4303.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207